人格扭曲——从刑法角度阐述其社会危害性 联系客服

发布时间 : 星期四 文章人格扭曲——从刑法角度阐述其社会危害性更新完毕开始阅读70e6c0231ed9ad51f11df213

题 目:院 系:专 业:姓 名:指导教师:完成日期:毕业论文

人格扭曲——从刑法角度阐述其社会危害性 王维 2012年6月16日

目 录

中英文摘要和关键词········································································2 引言··································································································3 一、人格扭曲引致罪案发生·····························································4

(一)神秘的“开膛手”···························································4 (二)以暴制暴的胡文海··························································5 二、理性与非理性因素探究······························································6

(一)犯罪心理分析··································································6 (二)法律的神圣性··································································7 三、社会危害性阐述·········································································8

(一)刑法的价值······································································8 (二)社会影响··········································································9 结语···································································································11 注释····································································································11 参考文献····························································································12

1

人格扭曲

——从刑法角度阐述其社会危害性

级 班 姓名:王维 学号: 指导老师:

中文摘要:经分析表明,疯狂杀人者往往异常兴奋于自己的杀人举动,并能够为自己的疯狂行为做出合理又充分的解释,而且这类人也能轻易说服他人认同自己的思维观念,反侦察的能力极强,其行为也造成巨大的社会恐慌。他们在犯案的时候不会想到自己的行为是否触及到法律层面,常用“应该与否”的尺度来衡量自己的行为从而得到内心的快感与满足。这是对神圣法律的亵渎。通过两个典型杀人案例中主人公的心理和生理变化描绘出这一类人的常态,表明刑法的价值,从而揭示出其疯狂举动所具有的社会危害性。具体分为如下几方面:一、人格扭曲引致罪案发生;二、理性与非理性因素分析;三、社会危害性阐述。 关键词:法律;人格扭曲;刑法;危害性

Abstract:Analysis showed that, crazy killers often excited in killing people move and be able to make a very reasonable explanation for their own madness, and these people can easily persuade others to identify themselves, the great capability of counter-surveillance, their behavior creates an enormous social panic. When they commit crimes would not have thought their behavior touched on the legal level, the commonly used \not\scale to measure their behavior in order to get the inner pleasure and satisfaction. This is the desecration of the sacred law. This article through the classic murder cases the protagonist's psychological and physiological changes paint this kind of normal, shows that the value of the criminal law, thus revealing them the serious harm to society. Concrete is divided into the following

2

aspects: First, personality distortions caused by the crime; analysis, rational and irrational factors; and social dangers described.

Key words:law ; personality distortions; criminal law; hazardous.

序言

法律的神圣性在于它的不偏不倚,无论是谁一旦触犯了法律,必然给予相应的惩罚。不论身处何地,法律都以其公正无私的特点约束着人们的行为。或是犯法之后成功被抓,或是因超高智商巧妙逃脱法律的制裁,这都不影响法律所赋予的执法者应有的权力,即使当时无法抓到犯案者,但终有一天真相会大白于天下,令受害者安息。并警告那些想要犯案或正在犯案的人们,无论你多聪明多狡猾,总有一天我们会找到你,即使因为时间的关系无法将你绳之于法,我们也不会放弃,这就是信念。

然而,并非所有的执法者都能公正的使用法律所赐予的权力。以英国为例,虽然要求严谨,但它始终为资本主义社会服务,等级的观念根深蒂固,说的通俗一些就是它基本无利于无产阶级而有利于资产阶级。尤其是十九世纪时期,对资产阶级而言,身处低层的无产阶级就像蝼蚁一样随意碾死而不需要负任何法律责任。英国刑法规定:如果查明了行为人而且警方决定起诉,就要由国家或者以国家的名义提起控诉;如果行为人被判定有罪,则不管是否责令他赔偿被害人的损失,他都要受到刑法处罚。

从这里就可以看出,控诉的决定权掌握在执法者手里,我们无法知道执法者在调查的过程中是否存在营私舞弊之嫌。但可以确定的是,他们一定会站在资产阶级那边。而这种有失公正的做法导致罢工和流血事件频发,给社会带来极大危害。相比较而言,社会主义国家的法律执行者要公平公正得多。

写此论文的目的亦在于通过对中英两个刑事案例深入探讨犯案人的内心变化以及案件对社会造成的严重危害,从而起到警醒世人的作用。

3